Questions for "seannaann"

I recently read the article online about an alcohol-fueled dispute in South Naknek that left two people with injuries serious enough for both to be medevaced to Anchorage. This is a horrible situation, for both that were injured.

It is unfortunate that what most likely began as an evening of fun had such a gruesome ending. It's not the article itself that has me thinking, though. It's one of the comments posted in the comment section after the article. The news website where the article is found just happens to be the most visited website in Alaska, so user names that are not very creative allow some readers to put two and two together.

The comment in question was posted by "seannaann", where the poster mentions that David is innocent and continues to explain why. Poster also says that the two responsible need to step forward and that Fred was sooo drunk, he didn't know what was going on while giving a statement.

My questions for "seannaann" - were you there when this all took place? If not, then how do you know what happened? How do you know there are two others that are responsible? Is it possible that Fred was still a bit groggy from just getting the snot beaten out of him? I mean c'mon, his injuries were serious enough for him to get medevaced first.

Something else - "seannaann" - do you think that you're going to heaven, while at the same time you're telling others they're going to hell? Stop and think about what you're saying. In other words, practice what you preach.

Given the seriousness of these charges, I'm sure that we're all hoping that the court system will sort out the truth.